Say "NO" To Sweatshops And "YES" To Jobs With Dignity

Do you believe that the child work is erroneous? Do you believe that the children should be at the school compared to a store making clothing which populates the use? If you answer yes, to both, you are not alone. There are many educational establishments in all the country in our country which as well as has a "policy of Sweatfree" with their materials of program of studies certain clothing. These particular establishments adapted a "code of conduct for the manufacturer of clothing". The industry of clothing was exposed to the unrestrained abuse workman. A man by the name of Andrew Ross submitted a report in 1997 the following, "industries of textile and of clothing are a display of the horrors for the abuses work sanctioned by the total economy of free exchange, where child the work, the slavery of wages, and the cruelty of employer are legion." ~ NO SWEAT: The fashion, the free exchange, and the lines of the workmen of clothing, Andrew Ross, writer, to follow 1997.The is ! some examples of clothing made in the bagnes: Uniforms of sports (this includes uniforms of room of gymnastics); uniforms of school; sporting shoes, shoes or espadrilles; fleece-lined sweaters, hats, and any other clothing printed with the logos of the school; régalia of academic; coats of laboratory and uniforms of personnel. Which is a bagne? A bagne is a place of work which is composed of the systematic violations of one or more of the rights of the fundamental workmen were violated according to the law and the laws and international payments' of site-of-production. The lines include: Workmen receiving wages right and advantages; Children not being subjected to the working conditions which could harm them physically, psychologically, or with the intellectual development; Absence of the excessive hours of work and forced labour, absence of abuse physical, sexual, and emotive, and of protection of health of risk and place of work as regards safety. A code of conduct is use! d to consider companies responsible. The majority of the compa! nies of today adapted their clean "code of conduct", unfortunately, company which the codes are often unsatisfactory to protect the workmen. What follows is a list of the President and their compensation during the year 1998, maintain in the spirit that all them the these President are used by the companies which them stores indeed used of sweat. Millard Drexler, GAP $660 million Michael Eisner, Disney $177 million Floyd Hall, Kmart $ 23 million knight of Phil, Nike $ 3 million Paul Charron, Liz Clairborne to follow millionThe of $ 40 out of glass of $7 David million are samples of starvation wages around the world. Guatemala 37 hundreds per hour El Salvador 60 hundred and one hour Nicaragua 23 hundred and one hour Honduras 43 hundred and one hour Haiti 30 hundred and one hour Mexico 50 hundred and one hour China 28 hundred and one hour Indonesia 20 hundred and one hour Burma 4 hundred and one hour Bangladesh 13-20 the hundred wages hourThese are called the "starvation wages". I emp! loy to be one of these people who constantly declared that our economy cannot be compared with other countries, I stated innocent this believing that which companies of the USA paid the workmen in these countries were the right wages in their economies, but after looking at the obviousness of what the President of company are making and knowing that in the countries such as El Salvador as well as of others, these families do not make enough to raise even their families, I supported certainly a change of heart. I our own needs for economy a serious increase of the face, but why cannot about it smell us to be humane for they? I estimate that the consumers have more power than they even know. I estimate that the consumers should consider companies responsible to respect the lines of the workmen, but not only as workmen, but as the human beings and they to have to be paid with wages "of life", not wages of "famine". I do not feel that us should boycott these companies, because ! why would owe us? We appreciate their products, reality here i! s that w e have pleasure to buy these articles, moreover, the boycotting of these companies would wound only work in the countries in the process of development. I support work for the countries in the process of development, but I estimate that the consumers should want that the people of these countries have work with the right dignity and wages. I believe that the President of these enormous companies could save a certain amount of money to ensure the people which facilitate their richness indeed can work with dignity and support their families, and if the refuse of P résident ? Les consommateurs devraient exiger les salaires justes. Ce qui si ces enfants étaient nos propres enfants ? Nos propres familles ? Ceci place une perspective différente sur des choses pour chaque enfant exécutant ces derniers charge est quelqu'un fils/fille ou quelqu'un mère/père. Ceci place vraiment une perspective réaliste sur ceci épidémie le plus souvent ignorée. Pour ceux de toi qui sont vraiment pass! ionnés au sujet de cette question, j'ai inclus quelques liens qui vous instruiront sur cette matière aussi bien que direct vous aux organismes qui tâchent de finir des « salaires de misère ». source de http://www.cleanclothes.org/http://www.globalexchange.org/Article : http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Nona_Nixon
loan personals